Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Annoyed (film) (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 00:36, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Annoyed (film)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't think this film was ever released. Can't find anything about this film. JayJay^{What did I do?} 20:19, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No indication that this movie satisfies WP:NFILM. No independent sources. Safiel (talk) 20:33, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Also, the Administrator at the first AfD probably should have been WP:BOLD and deleted this. While there was little participation, the participants all acknowledged that the film did not seem to satisfy the notability guidelines. Safiel (talk) 20:37, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- No, not exactly... and with the little participation, all that was really agreed upon was that we had great difficulty finding sources for a Khmer language Cambodian film. With no agreement to delete past the nominator himself, the closer followed procedure with a no-consensus. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 01:59, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cambodia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:23, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:23, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

filmmaker:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

alt:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Weak delete per lacking coverage... even in consideration of WP:CSB. The Wayback Machine shows the "official website" (now dead) was in existence from 2007 to mid-2010 implying that the project was under work during that time,[1] and I did find a blog speaking about it being released back in 2007.here and here. An early work of Cambodian Tim Pek (The Red Sense), it is very likely that coverage will be only in Khmer language. Can anyone here politely poke a Khmer-reading Cambodian Wikipedian? And if we ever DO have an article on Pek, it can be mentioned therein. Pek speaks about making his film Annoyed here. IF author Engsamnang wishes it userfied while he finds and translates sources, I'd say yes. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 01:59, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per MichaelQSchmidt. --Bejnar (talk) 15:49, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Annoyed (film)

zproxy.org